Legal Opinion

Ball v. Murray

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 9, 1955No. 35532PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.

“Code § 61-111 provides as follows: ‘The landlord must keep the premises in repair, and shall be liable for all substantia] improvements placed upon them by his consent.’ Where the landlord has fully parted with possession and right of possession, he must have reasonable notice of the defective condition of the premises as a condition of liability therefor. Davis v. Hall, 21 Ga. App. 265, 268 (94 S. E. 274); Ocean Steamship Co. v. Hamilton, 112 Ga. 901 (38 S. E. 204); Ledbetter v. Gibbs, 19 Ga. App. 485 (91 S. E. 875). Notice of a defect given by the tenant to the landlord charges the latter…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stack v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Ocean Steamship Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Gledhill v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  4. Mathis v. GazanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. Davis v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beckmann v. RakoskeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. Ball v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  3. Scott Development Co. v. MunnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API