Atlanta Hub Co. v. Bussey
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.
Code § 105-108 provides in part as follows: “Every person shall be liable for torts committed by . . . his servant, by his command or in the prosecution and within the scope of his business, whether the same shall be by negligence or voluntary.” In Frazier v. Southern Ry. Co., 200 Ga. 590, 593 (37 S. E. 2d 774) it is stated: “The true test is not whether the tort was committed by reason of anger, malice, or ill will, but whether or not it was committed in the prosecution and within the scope of the master’s business. If the tort be committed, not by reason of the employment, but because of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Frazier v. Southern Railway CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Baldwin v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- King v. YarbraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Williams v. InmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Fulton Grocery Co. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chamberlin Co. of America v. MaysCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957