Legal Opinion
Akers v. Bonifasi
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided November 14, 1985No. Civ. A. 3:84-0924PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NEESE, Senior District Judge,
Sitting by Designation and Assignment.
The filing by the defendant Mobile Telephone of America, Inc. (Mobile Telephone) of a petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona on February 9, 1984 operated automatically to stay the commencement of this action as to that debtor, but not as to the other persons named defendants herein. 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(1); Lynch v. Johns-Man-ville Sales Corp., 710 F.2d 1194, 1196-1197[1] (6th Cir.1983).
Accordingly, the Court will proceed herein as if Mobile Telephone had not been named a party…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Grantham and Mann, Inc., D/B/A Grantham Safety Industries, Inc. v. American Safety Products, Inc., Sam Evans, Richard J. Althoff and James HunnekeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Nichols v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & SmithDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1989
- Langlois v. ENERGY AUTOMATION SYSTEMS, INC.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
- Smith Corona Corp. v. Pelikan, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1992
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.