Legal Opinion
Smith Corona Corp. v. Pelikan, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided January 9, 1992No. 3-90-0479PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
HIGGINS, District Judge.
Pursuant to Rules 50(b) and 59(a), Fed. R.Civ.P., the Court has before it the motion of defendant Pelikan, Inc., for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, a new trial (filed April 8, 1991; Docket Entry No. 246), and an accompanying memorandum in support thereof (filed April 8, 1991; Docket Entry No. 247). On May 1, 1991, Smith Corona Corporation filed a memorandum in opposition to Peli-kan’s motion (Docket Entry No. 260). Thereafter, Pelikan submitted a reply memorandum (filed May 15,1991; Docket Entry No. 270).
In addition, the Court…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Parker v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Alpo Petfoods, Inc. v. Ralston Purina CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Concrete Spaces, Inc. v. SenderTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- Skydive Arizona, Inc. v. QuattrocchiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Lien v. CouchCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- ATS Southeast, Inc. v. Carrier Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Buddy Lee Attractions, Inc. v. William Morris Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.