Legal Opinion
Francis W. King Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Geiger
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 27, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on the first cause of action against Petro Chemical Funding, Inc., and 473 East Delevan, Inc. (defendants), alleging an account stated. Plaintiff met its initial burden of submitting evidentiary proof in admissible form that defendants received and retained plaintiff’s accounts without objection within a reasonable time (see, Werner v Nelkiri, 206 AD2d 422, 423; Jim-Mar Corp. v Aquatic Constr., 195 AD2d 868, 869, lv denied 82 NY2d 660; Shea & Gould v Burr, 194 AD2d…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jim-Mar Corp. v. Aquatic Construction, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Shea & Gould v. BurrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Werner v. NelkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Battista v. RadesiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by4 opinions
- Erdman Anthony & Associates, Inc. v. BarkstromAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Schneider Fuel Oil, Inc. v. DeGennaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Wm. Schutt & Assoc. Eng'g & Land Surveying P.C. v. St. Bonaventure Univ.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- EKLECCO NEWCO, LLC v. Q OF PALISADES, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012