Legal Opinion

People v. Jensen

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 19, 1926No. Docket No. 1279PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

Defendant was charged with the crime of assault with intent to commit the infamous crime against nature. The jury returned a verdict by which defendant was found guilty of the lesser offense of an attempt to commit the said crime. He appeals from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The first point, as suggested by appellant, is that because an attempt to commit the offense with which defendant was charged might be less than the crime of an assault with intent to commit it (People v. Akens, 25 Cal. App. 373 [143 Pac. 975]), the verdict of guilty of an attempt would be…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. RobbinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. People v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. People v. MuhlnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. People v. Dong Pok YipCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. People v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. DexterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. State v. KeckonenMontana Supreme Court · 1938
  3. People v. BattilanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. People v. GoldsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. People v. DutraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API