Legal Opinion

Hardaker v. Superintendent

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 5, 2018No. 17–P–346Published

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff is confined to the Massachusetts Treatment Center at Bridgewater. In June of 2015, five items of contraband were found in the plaintiff's cell. Based on this, and on remarks he made when confronted with the items, the plaintiff was charged administratively with eight disciplinary violations. As the result of a plea agreement, the plaintiff received and served an agreed-upon sanction of twenty days of confinement in the "minimum privilege unit" (MPU). Nevertheless, he brought an action in the nature of certiorari, G. L. c. 249, § 4, challenging the disposition of the disciplinary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Department of Revenue v. Ryan R.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  2. City of Gloucester v. Civil Service CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Debnam v. Town of BelmontMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. LaChance v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API