Legal Opinion

Louisville Woolen Mills v. Johnson

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 4, 1916No. 2791PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of KentuckyWalter Evans, Judge. In tlie matter of the Tapp Clothing Company, bankrupt. From an order denying a claim of preference of the Louisville Woolen Mills, opposed by C. W. Johnson, trustee, the claimant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

Section 2487 of the Kentucky Statute? provides that when the property of any manufacturing establishment should be assigned for the benefit of creditors, come into the hands of any executor, administrator, commissioner, receiver, trustee, or as-signee for the benefit of creditors, or in any wise come to be distributed among creditors, the employes of such establishment “and the persons who should have furnished materials or supplies for the carrying on of such business” shall have a lien upon the property and effects involved in such business. Section 2488 says that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad v. Laramie Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Holt v. HenleySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. In re BennettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
  4. In re ScottDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1904
  5. Winter v. Howell's AssigneeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ginsberg v. LindelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  2. In Re ReichertDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1936
  3. Jones v. Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
  4. Louisville Woolen Mills v. TappCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  5. In Re Freeze-In Manufacturing CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API