Legal Opinion

Peteski Productions, Inc. v. Rothman

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided August 30, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:17-CV-00122-JRGPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RODNEY GILSTRAP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is Defendant Leah Rothman’s (“Defendant” or “Rothman”) Motion to Dismiss or Alternatively for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 10) (“the Motion”). Having considered the Motion, and for the reasons set forth below, said Motion is hereby DENIED with respect to fair use and, sua sponte, summary judgment is GRANTED in favor of Plaintiff on the issue of fair use.

I. Background

Rothman worked for Plaintiff Peteski Productions, Inc. (“Plaintiff’ or “Peteski”) as a Segment Director for The Dr. Phil Show from 2003 to…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bell v. Eagle Mountain Saginaw Independent School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2021
  2. Kipp Flores Architects, LLC v. Pradera SFR, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2023
  3. Stross v. Hearst Communications, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API