Legal Opinion

Meintzer v. Weinberg

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 11, 1994No. A93A2335PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs/appellants Robert and Vesta Meintzer brought this personal injury and loss of consortium action against defendant/appellee Charles Weinberg after plaintiff Robert Meintzer was injured by a weed eater operated by defendant. The jury returned a verdict against plaintiffs and judgment was entered accordingly. Plaintiffs appeal, enumerating three errors.

1. In their first enumeration of error, plaintiffs argue that the trial court erred in refusing to excuse juror Guy Sears for cause, which action, according to plaintiffs, forced them to use one of their peremptory…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Garland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  2. Morris v. BonnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  3. Parisie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. Ellison v. National By-Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Luke v. SuberCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  2. Guoth v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. Pavamani, P. C. v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Stolte v. FaganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  5. Luke v. SuberCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API