Legal Opinion

Luke v. Suber

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 27, 1995No. A94A1949PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs Karen and Marcus Luke appeal from a jury verdict for defendant obstetrician. Because the trial court improperly allowed defendant to elicit testimony regarding plaintiffs’ insurance coverage, we reverse the judgment entered on the jury verdict and remand the case for a new trial.

Defendant performed a caesarean section on Karen Luke on Friday, February 2, 1990. Although the baby was healthy, the mother *85suffered from ileus (paralysis of the bowel) following the surgery. Her stomach became severely distended, she was in extreme pain, and her pulse and respiration…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Denton v. Con-Way Southern Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  3. Hill v. Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Patterson v. LauderbackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  5. Daniel v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Warren v. BallardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  2. Baxter v. CohenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  3. Brown v. MacHeersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. Lorrene Woods v. Shawn HeathCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2024
  5. Luke v. SuberCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API