Legal Opinion
Lamb v. Registered Dentists
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 18, 1972No. 43648PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
492 P.2d 1401 (1972)
Jim C. LAMB, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
The REGISTERED DENTISTS of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.
No. 43648.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
January 18, 1972.
Finch & Finch, Sapulpa, for plaintiff in error.
Lyons & Dean, Pryor, for defendant in error.
BARNES, Justice:
In this action, instituted by defendant in error, hereafter referred to as "plaintiff", plaintiff in error, a dental technician, hereafter referred to as "defendant", was enjoined from practicing dentistry without a license; and he has appealed.
One of defendant's arguments is that the purported verification on the petition,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Liles v. BigpondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Educators Automobile Insurance Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Myers v. DiehlSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Board of Governors of the Registered Dentists v. MeltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Berry v. Board of Governors of the Registered DentistsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Board of Governors of the Registered Dentists v. BurkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Butler v. Board of Governors of the Registered DentistsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Berry v. Board of Governors of the Registered DentistsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980