Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Crump Manufacturing Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1894PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to Bay. (Cobb, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The defendant leased the premises in controversy upon the 1st day of May, 1881, for the period of five years, entering at once. Upon these premises it erected an extensive manufactory. On May 1, 1886, when the lease expired, it obtained another lease of the premises from the plaintiff, who had meantime purchased them. This lease was for the term of “ five years next ensuing the 1st day of May, 1886,'fully to be complete and ended,” at an “annual rent of 1200, to be paid in advance quarterly installments,” at the office of the lessor, Cion the 1st day of May, August, November, and February,”…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Caperton v. StegeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cameron v. Oakland County Gas & Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Counts v. MedleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. La Dow v. E. Bement & SonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Haywood v. . BriggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Fellows v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API