Legal Opinion
In Re Fuentes
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided December 4, 1997No. 13-97-464-CVPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
YANEZ, Justice.
This original mandamus proceeding concerns the propriety of the trial court’s order granting a new trial. Relators, Martin Flores Fuentes and Marks & Rodriguez Delivery Service, Inc., complain that respondent, the Honorable Judge Robert Garza, abused his discretion in entering an order granting a new trial on May 5,1997, because it was entered after the court had already lost plenary jurisdiction. Relators request that this Court grant this writ of mandamus and writ of prohibition directing Judge Garza to vacate his May 5, 1997 order and to proceed no further in this…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Moody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Champion International Corp. v. Twelfth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Hamilton v. Empire Gas & Fuel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1937
- State v. Ferguson KirbyTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Urbish v. 127th Judicial District CourtTexas Supreme Court · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Perdue v. Patten Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
- State v. Shaw, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1999
- United Oil & Minerals, Inc. v. Costilla Energy, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
- McCall v. Tana Oil and Gas Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
- in Re Cas Companies, LP Incorrectly Named Clean Air Solutions of Houston, LLC and Bill Bowlin, Individually, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.