Legal Opinion
McCall v. Tana Oil and Gas Corp.
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided October 18, 2001No. 03-00-00347-CVPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN E. POWERS, Justice, (Retired).
Tom C. McCall and David B. McCall (the “McCalls”) appeal from a judgment that they take nothing by their claims against Tana Oil and Gas Corporation and Robert B. Rowling (“appellees”). We will affirm the judgment in part and reverse in another part, remanding to the trial court the part reversed.
THE CONTROVERSY
John Niemeyer retained the McCalls to represent him in litigation with Tana Oil and Gas Corporation. In Niemeyer’s behalf, the McCalls sued the corporation on October 19, 1995, in the Fayette County district court, to recover mineral royalties…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Financial Review Services, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Wilen v. FalkensteinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- G.R.A.V.I.T.Y. Enterprises, Inc. v. Reece Supply Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
- Tana Oil and Gas Corp. v. McCallTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Harris v. Archer, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
- Qwest Communications International, Inc. v. AT & T Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.