Legal Opinion
Ex parte Sichofsky
District Court, S.D. California
Decided May 31, 1921No. 2991PublishedCited by 12 opinions
On petition of Abram Sichofsky for writ of habeas corpus.
1Opinion of the Court
BLEDSOE, District Judge.
The contentions advanced by petitioner herein as a reason why he should be discharged from his present custody, maintained by the United States marshal in virtue of a commitment heretofore issued out of this court, following his plea of guilty as for a violation of law of the United States, may be briefly stated and determined:
The indictment to which petitioner pleaded guilty charged him, a citizen of Poland, with having, on or about the 23d day of August, 1920, entered and attempted to enter the United States from the republic of Mexico, “without then and there…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hamilton v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. ReisingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- R. Ribas Y Hijo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- In re JenningsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1902
3Cited by12 opinions
- Frankel v. WoodroughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- United States v. Bert Croft, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
- People v. SichofskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Flora v. RustadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Bowles v. SoverinskyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.