Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Bowles v. Soverinsky

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided May 20, 1946No. 5558PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KOSCINSKI, District Judge.

Plaintiff’s complaint alleges violation by defendants of Maximum Price Regulation No. 47, as amended, effective January 11, 1943 (8 F. R. 270) prescribing maximum prices for waste rags, ropes and strings, sold and delivered by dealers and brokers, and prays for final injunction restraining defendants from violating provisions of the regulation establishing maximum prices for waste materials and engaging in practices contrary to the provisions of the regulation, as issued.

Defendants answered, denying the alleged violations, and moved to dismiss the complaint on the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Lockerty v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. R. Ribas Y Hijo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. The ProtectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. La Jolla Casa deManana v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. Jones v. Boyd Truck Lines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1951
  3. Samuels v. United Seamen's Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  4. Apodaca v. GordonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. SyQuia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API