Legal Opinion · Dissent

Grindstaff v. Green

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 8, 1998No. 96-5628Published

1DissentKrupansky, Circuit Judge

A novel dispute in this circuit has arisen from the facts alleged in the plaintiffs’ complaint. Cases of first impression invariably present difficult matters for courts because the prevailing notions of guidance upon which they must rely are absent. See Kroger Co. v. NLRB, 647 F.2d 634, 639 n. 6 (6th Cir.1980). In this instance, I am prompted to dissent because I believe that by unduly deferring to the legal conclusions of the district court, and failing to read the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, the majority has reached an erroneous conclusion that erodes the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Bracy v. GramleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API