Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Rhodes

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 2000No. Nos. 99-1652 and 99-1962PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

This appeal presents two issues for our consideration. First, we must determine whether the period of limitations provided in R.C. 2305.10 is tolled when an individual temporarily leaves the state of Ohio for non-business reasons. In addition, we must determine if the application of R.C. 2305.15 against such an individual is unconstitutional for the reason that it constitutes an impermissible burden on interstate commerce under the holding of the United States Supreme Court in Bendix Autolite Corp. v. Midwesco Enterprises, Inc. (1988), 486 U.S. 888, 108 S.Ct. 2218, 100 L.Ed.2d 896.

R.C.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bendix Autolite Corp. v. Midwesco Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Wetzel v. WeyantOhio Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Grover v. BartschOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Marshall Garber v. Heriberto Menendez, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  3. Pelletier v. Mercy Health Youngstown, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. Cramer v. Archdiocese of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Johnson v. RhodesOhio Supreme Court · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API