Legal Opinion

City of Dayton v. Smith

City of Dayton Municipal Court

Decided November 8, 1994No. 94 CRB 5082PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Alice 0. McCollum, Judge.

This cause came before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss and to declare R.C. 2903.211 unconstitutional, and the state’s memorandum contra defendant’s motion to dismiss. An oral hearing was held on October 21, 1994.

*22Defendant, Michael R. Smith, was charged with stalking in violation of R.C. 2903.211, the newly enacted anti-stalking statute. The complaint reads in pertinent part:

“[0]n or about July 15, 1994, Michael Smith did unlawfully engage in a pattern of conduct which knowingly caused Diana Chivers to believe that he would cause physical harm or mental…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Coates v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Wisconsin v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Luplow v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. KingeryOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State v. WocheleOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API