Legal Opinion

Hellen v. Hellen

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided April 25, 2013No. 2012AP1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlanchard, J.

¶ 1. In this case, we are called upon to interpret and apply the equine immunity statute, Wis. Stat. § 895.481 (2011-12).1 The basic facts are that Ruth Hellen was injured as a result of contact with a horse named Whisper as Ruth held Whisper's lead rope and Ruth's daughter-in-law, Rebecca Hellen, prepared to ride Whisper. The circuit court concluded on summary judgment that the equine immunity statute applies to bar Ruth's claims against Rebecca and Whisper's owner, Jack Linney. Ruth appeals the resulting order and a subsequent order denying her motion for reconsideration.

¶ 2. The statute…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  2. Hines v. ResnickCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011
  3. Kangas v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
  4. Adams v. HareCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Barritt v. LoweCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. PNC Bank, N.A. v. HoornaarDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2014
  2. Judy Dilley v. Holiday Acres Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  3. Janey Shafer v. Frank SantanaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2026
  4. Judy Dilley v. Holiday Acres Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API