Legal Opinion

Tait v. Midway Field Oil Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 17, 1915No. Civ. No. 1379PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order denying his motion for a change of venue of the action from the county of Los Angeles to the county of Kern.

The motion was based upon the ground of convenience of witnesses and that the ends of justice would be promoted by the change, and was heard upon affidavits of the respective parties, together with the complaint and answers on file.

The rules applicable to changes of venue on account of convenience of witnesses have been-stated in various decisions of the supreme court and of the district courts of appeal. Such motions are addressed to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pascoe v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Willingham v. PecoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Blossom v. WallerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  3. Topham v. HuntingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Ryan v. Inyo Cerro Gordo Mining & Power Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API