Legal Opinion

MUNIZ v. STOBER

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 19, 2023No. 5:18-cv-04619Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSE MUNIZ, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-4619 : STOBER et al., : : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM OPINION SCHMEHL, J. /s/ JLS October 19, 2023 Plaintiff Josue Muniz (whose name was apparently misspelled in the operative pleadings as “Jose”) initiated this negligence and strict products liability action after suffering gruesome injuries from operating a cross-cutting blade-and-saw machine for his employer, Palram Company. Defendant Breyer GmbH Maschinenfabrik (“Breyer”), who designed and manufactured the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Blunt v. Lower Merion School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  3. Philip J. Podobnik v. United States Postal Service National Rural Letter Carriers Association John E. Potter, Postmaster General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  4. EBC, Inc. v. Clark Building System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. William N. Clark v. Modern Group Ltd. John F. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API