Legal Opinion

Eugene Water & Elec. Bd. v. Pub. Emps. Ret. Bd. & John T. Wigle

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 2019No. SC S065686PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.

*597**61Respondent John Wigle first worked for petitioner Eugene Water and Electric Board (EWEB) as a temporary worker in a series of positions through a temporary-staffing company. EWEB, a public employer, later hired Wigle as a regular employee. When Wigle retired from EWEB, a dispute ensued over when Wigle had become eligible for retirement benefits from the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS). The outcome would affect the amount of Wigle's monthly retirement benefit.

The dispute centers on what the legislature intended in a 1981 statute governing PERS eligibility. That statute provides,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Comcast Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Hughes v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Owen v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Moore v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. Oregon Racing, Inc. v. Oregon State LotteryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API