Legal Opinion

Hanchey v. Consolidated Underwriters

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 23, 1949No. 7373PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff was seriously injured on May 15, 1947, while engaged in cutting and hauling logs to the mill of the Burlington Lumber Company. Total disability resulted from the accident because of which he was paid workmen's compensation by the lumber company's insurer, Consolidated Underwriters of Kansas City, Missouri, for thirty-four (34) weeks, at $20.00 per week. Upon cessation of such payments this suit was filed wherein the plaintiff seeks judgment for additional compensation on the theory that he is permanently totally disabled to perform work of any reasonable character.

The suit is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nesmith v. Reich Bros.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  2. Ryland v. Harve M. Wheeler Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  3. Crysel v. Gifford-Hill & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Litton v. Natchitoches Oil Mill, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Collins v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roybal v. Bates Lumber CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Amyx v. HenryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Richards v. Consolidated UnderwritersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Taylor v. Bass-Boyd Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API