Legal Opinion
Broadway & Twentieth Properties, Inc. v. Paramount Publix Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 17, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
There is no appeal pending from any order or decree of the court below, but the petitioners apply for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and/or certiorari to stay a District Judge because it is said he has exceeded his jurisdiction and intends to further do so.
In March, 1932, the Paramount Publix Corporation made transfers claimed to be fraudulent or preferential, and again, on November 17, 1932, it was said to have transferred to a corporation, which it then organized, properties with fraudulent intent to defeat creditors, or as preferential amongst its creditors. On…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- In re Hudson River Electric Power Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1909
- In re Oakland Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
- Woolford v. Diamond State Steel Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1905
- In re Edward Ellsworth Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1909
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re TauscherUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1982
- In Re Dejay Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- In Re Paramount-Publix CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1934
- In Re Insull Utility Investments, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1933
- Metropolitan Life Ins. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.