Legal Opinion
In Re Insull Utility Investments, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 22, 1933No. 49943PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, Circuit Judge.
The questions which are here presented grow out of the petition of Calvin Fentress for compensation for services rendered as receiver and compensation to Allen & Dalbey and Cassels, Potter & Bentley for legal services rendered.
Fentress was appointed receiver of the Insull Utility Investments, Inc. upon motion of plaintiff Cherry, who filed a suit in the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against said company. After his appointment as receiver in the main suit brought in the Northern District of Illinois, he was appointed ancillary receiver in New York…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Black & White Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Harkin v. BrundageSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Dickerman v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Blair v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Masterson v. PergamentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- In Re Insull Utility InvestmentsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
- In Re Middle West Utilities Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1936
- In Re Paramount-Publix CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1934
- Lincoln Printing Co. v. Middle West Utilities Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.