Sharkus v. Daimler Chrysler Corp., Unpublished Decision (10-17-2002)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant Bradley Sharkus ("appellant") appeals from the judgment of the trial court which directed a verdict in favor of defendant-appellee DaimlerChrysler Motors Corporation ("DCC") following the close of the plaintiff's evidence at a jury trial. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
{¶ 2} Appellant filed a complaint on April 3, 2000 against DCC which alleged the following causes of action: (1) breach of express and implied warranties of merchantability pursuant to the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act as set forth in 15…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ruta v. Breckenridge-Remy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
- Howell v. Dayton Power & Light Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Keeton v. Telemedia Co. of Southern OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Campbell v. ColleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Gliner v. Saint-Gobain Norton Indus. Ceramics Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000