Legal Opinion

Angelina Mapalad Ercia v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 13, 1994No. 92-70808Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

26 F.3d 130

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Angelina Mapalad ERCIA, Petitioner,

v.

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 92-70808.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 9, 1994.*

Decided June 13, 1994.

Before: D.W. NELSON, BEEZER, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Juan Cesar Vargas v. U.S. Department of Immigration and NaturalizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Rios-PinedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API