Legal Opinion

In Re Readoption of Njac 10a: 23

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 20, 2004PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

842 A.2d 207 (2004)

367 N.J. Super. 61

In the Matter of READOPTION WITH AMENDMENTS OF DEATH PENALTY REGULATIONS N.J.A.C. 10A:23, by the New Jersey Department of Corrections.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 3, 2004.

Decided February 20, 2004.

Kevin D. Walsh, argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent New Jerseyans for a Death Penalty Moratorium.

David M. Ragonese, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant Department of Corrections (Peter C. Harvey, Attorney General, attorney; Patrick DeAlmeida, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel;…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. State v. RamseurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  5. State v. LoftinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Education Law Center ex rel. Abbott v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  2. New Jerseyans for a Death Penalty Moratorium v. New Jersey Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  3. Gannett NJ Partners v. MiddlesexNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  4. Bergen v. North Jersey MediaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
  5. K.L. v. Evesham Township Board of EducationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API