Legal Opinion

Garnett v. Coyle

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 2001No. 00-319PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Justice.

[¶ 1] This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted to the appellee, Dr. John Coyle (Dr. Coyle). The district court found that the appellant, Kerry Garnett (Garnett), had (1) failed properly to plead the allegations necessary to sustain a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action; (2) failed to establish a prima facie case to sustain a violation of his civil rights under the Eighth Amendment; and (8) failed to set forth prima facie evidence to sustain a medical malpractice claim.

[¶ 2] Finding no error in the district court's determination that there are no genuine issues of material fact and…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Helling v. McKinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Caballo Coal Company v. Fidelity Exploration & Production CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Markstein v. Countryside I, L.L.C.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Hickman v. GrovesWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Snake River Brewing Co. v. Town of JacksonWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Franks v. Independent Production Co., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API