Legal Opinion

Cole v. Dych

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1976Published

1Opinion of the Court

535 S.W.2d 315 (1976)

Homer COLE et al., Petitioners,

v.

David W. DYCH et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Tennessee.

February 17, 1976.

Frank B. Bird, Bird, Navratil, Tate & Bird, Maryville, William R. Holt, Jr., Holt, Gilreath & Brooks, Sevierville, for petitioners.

R.B. Hailey, Hailey, Water, Jarvis & Sykes, Gatlinburg, for City of Gatlinburg.

William P. Newkirk, Donald F. Paine, Egerton, McAfee, Armistead, Davis & McCord, Knoxville, for respondents.

OPINION

HENRY, Justice.

This suit in chancery, brought and sustained as a class action, seeks to preserve an easement of ingress and egress by the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cole v. DychTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Doyle v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Sumner County v. Interurban Transp. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  4. McKinney v. DuncanTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Cottrell v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API