Cole v. Dych
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENRY, Justice.
This suit in chancery, brought and sustained as a class action, seeks to preserve an easement of ingress and egress by the issuance of a mandatory injunction commanding respondents to restore it to its former condition. Involved is a roadway to the Gatlinburg Cemetery. The Chancellor found the issues in favor of petitioners and granted the injunction. The Court of Appeals concurred in the finding of the Chancellor that there had been a dedication by implication for cemetery purposes but reversed as to the injunctive relief.
We reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Doyle v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
- Sumner County v. Interurban Transp. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1918
- McKinney v. DuncanTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
- Cottrell v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
- Johnson City v. WolfeTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Bradley v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- Cellco Partnership v. Shelby CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
- State Ex Rel. Collier v. City of Pigeon ForgeTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
- Cooper v. PolosCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- Rogers v. SainCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.