Legal Opinion
Haviland v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 8, 1990No. 89 CIV. 8463 (LBS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAND, District Judge.
Plaintiff Leo Haviland brings suit against his former employer Goldman, Sachs & Co. (“Goldman”) and its affiliate J. Aron & Co. (“Aron”) alleging injury caused by a pattern of racketeering activity that included mail fraud, wire fraud and attempted extortion. The defendants now seek an order pursuant to section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 3, staying these judicial proceedings pending the completion of arbitration. We grant the motion to stay the claims asserted against defendant Goldman and deny the motion to stay the claims asserted against…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- James E. Morgan v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- John M. Pearce v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Aaron Fleck v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc., and E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Cheryl Coudert v. Paine Webber Jackson & CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Leo Haviland v. Goldman, Sachs & Co., J. Aron & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Chisolm v. Kidder, Peabody Asset Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Haviland v. J. Aron & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- CBS, INC. v. SnyderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Leo Haviland v. Goldman, Sachs & Co., J. Aron & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991