Legal Opinion

Sandbeck v. Rockwell

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1994No. Civ. 940125Published

1Opinion of the Court

524 N.W.2d 846 (1994)

Deborah SANDBECK, Petitioner and Appellee,

v.

Bronson J. ROCKWELL, Respondent and Appellant.

Civ. No. 940125.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

December 2, 1994.

Serkland, Lundberg, Erickson, Marcil & McLean, Ltd., for petitioner and appellee; argued by Armond G. Erickson.

Bronson J. Rockwell (argued), pro se.

MESCHKE, Justice.

Bronson J. Rockwell appealed a domestic violence order restraining him from contact with Deborah Sandbeck for twelve months. We conclude that the protection order was based on sufficient evidence at a "full hearing" of Sandbeck's motion, when Rockwell failed…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gajewski v. BratcherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  2. New Hampshire Fire Insurance v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Central Republic Bank & Trust Co. v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  4. Difani v. Riverside County Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Steckler v. StecklerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API