Legal Opinion
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Frank Csapo
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 5, 1976No. 74-1947PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUMBARD, Senior Circuit Judge:
The Securities and Exchange Commission appeals from an order of the district court conditioning enforcement of the SEC’s subpoena of respondent Frank Csapo upon Csapo’s right to be accompanied by the attorneys of his choice — Sidney Feldshuh and Paul Chernis — while he was questioned by the Commission staff. At issue is the standard by which a district court should evaluate the propriety of the Commission’s application of its duly enacted rule authorizing the sequestration of any lawyer appearing on behalf of more than one witness called to testify in an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Hannah v. LarcheSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Federal Communications Commission v. SchreiberSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- In Re Investigation Before the April 1975 Grand Jury. Appeal of Sol Z. Rosen and Local 6 of the Newspaper and Graphic Communication UnionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- John Doe v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Professional Reactor Operator Society v. The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Touche Ross & Co. v. SecCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- United States Department of Justice v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Touche Ross & Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.