Legal Opinion

Almeida v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 8, 1995No. 14955PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.

The principal issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly granted an application to vacate an arbitration award. Michael Almeida, the plaintiff in the first case and the defendant in the second case (plaintiff), was injured in a motor vehicle accident and subsequently filed a claim for underinsured motorists benefits with Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, the defendant in the first case and the plaintiff in the second case (defendant). The defendant denied coverage and the parties submitted the claim to compulsory arbitration. The arbitration panel found for the defendant. The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Quimby v. Kimberly Clark Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  2. Chmielewski v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. O & G/O'Connell Joint Venture v. Chase Family Ltd. Partnership No. 3Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. Rydingsword v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Skuzinski v. Bouchard Fuels, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 1565 v. Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. State Library v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  4. Bryan v. Sheraton-Hartford HotelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. ZasunConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API