Kempf Contracting & Design, Inc. v. Holland-Tucker
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRSCH, Judge.
Kempf Contracting and Design, Inc. (“Kempf’) appeals the judgment, after a jury trial, in favor of Cynthia Holland-Tucker (“Tucker”) in her action against Kempf for negligence. Kempf raises several issues, of which we find the following dispositive: whether the trial court erred when it entered judgment on a second verdict reached by the jury, where, after an initial verdict was reached, the trial court reconvened the jury, gave them new instructions and verdict forms, and allowed the jury to deliberate a second time.
We reverse and remand.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- West v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
- Indiana Michigan Power Co. v. RungeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Estate of WagersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Stowers v. Clinton Central School Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Irmscher Suppliers, Inc. v. SchulerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Cox v. MatthewsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Southard v. BelangerDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2013
- Coldwell Banker Roth Wehrly Graber v. Laub Bros. Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Lahaina Fashions, Inc. v. Bank of HawaiiHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.