Legal Opinion

Boorstein v. Boorstein

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 10, 1946No. Docket 148/681Published

1Opinion of the Court

The complainant, Ruth Boorstein, and the defendant William Boorstein were married in 1933. One child, Seth Alan, was born of the marriage, and is now of the approximate age of nine years. After their marriage, Ruth and William lived at the home of William's parents, the defendants herein, Rose and Harris Boorstein. They remained with Rose and Harris for about two years, when they rented an apartment in which they resided until about March, 1937.

Shortly after the birth of their child aforesaid, or about September, 1936, complainant says the defendants Rose and Harris offered to build a home…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McGann v. La Brecque Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1920
  2. Clark v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  3. Red Oaks, Inc. v. Dorez, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  4. Commercial Trust, C., Bank v. HamiltonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  5. Reeves v. CooperNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1859

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API