Reeves v. Cooper
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
This injunction must be dissolved upon both grounds taken on the argument of the motion —that a party asking equity must do equity — and that a party cannot have relief in equity where he has an adequate remedy at law.
There is a judgment in attachment in the Supreme Court against the complainant for upwards of one hundred and seventy thousand dollars. Five thousand shares, or more, of the capital stock of the Cumberland Nail and Iron Company were attached as the property of the defendants. The auditors have advertised the stock for sale. The complainants ask this court to…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Commercial Trust, C., Bank v. HamiltonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
- Bogosian v. First National Bank of MillburnNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Simon v. HenkeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
- Patsourakos v. KolioutosNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
- Rogers-Ebert Co. v. Century Const. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.