Legal Opinion
Royal Ins. v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 7, 1923No. 5998PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POLLOCK, District Judge.
The question of merit presented by the record in this proceeding and the manner in which it arose may be stated as follows:
Plaintiff in error (hereinafter called the “insurance company”), for ample consideration, made and delivered to the receivers of the railway company (hereinafter called the “carrier”) a blanket policy of insurance covering all loss which the carrier should sustain from fire for the period of one year from September 1, 1914, to September 1, 1915, on cotton carried during said period for which damage and loss by fire the carrier was legally liable.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- B. Roth Tool Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Railroad v. Southern Railway News Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. Campania Transatlantica EspanolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Washington & Berkeley Bridge Co. v. Pennsylvania Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jewelers Mutual Insurance Company v. Julien Balogh and Harriet Balogh, D/B/A Balogh's of Coral GablesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Globe & Republic Insurance Co. of America v. Independent Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Standard Surety & Casualty Co. of New York v. Standard Acc. Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Imperial Refining Co. v. Kanotex Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Carolina Transportation & Distributing Co. v. American Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.