Legal Opinion
Weill v. East Sunset Park Realty, LLC
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 12, 2012PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*858In this mortgage foreclosure action, the plaintiffs claimed that their mortgage was superior in priority to the interests claimed by the defendants East Sunset Park Realty, LLC (hereinafter East Sunset), and Flushing Preferred Funding Corp. (hereinafter Flushing), with respect to certain real property in Brooklyn. East Sunset and Flushing moved pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them, alleging that they did not have constructive or actual notice of the plaintiffs’ mortgage interest, which had been improperly recorded (see Weill v East Sunset…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McLean v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Valdez v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- Pelaez v. SeideNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Waterman v. Weinstein Memorial ChapelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Weill v. East Sunset Park Realty, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
3Cited by7 opinions
- Spitzer v. LandauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Westwood, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Gani v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2014
- Hasson v. S.B.J. Associates, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Hasson v. S.B.J. Associates, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.