Legal Opinion

Weill v. East Sunset Park Realty, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 12, 2012PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On a motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), the court must “accept the facts as alleged in the complaint as true, accord plaintiffs the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory” (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). While a court is “permitted to consider evidentiary material submitted by a defendant in support of a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7)” (Sokol v Leader, 74 AD3d 1180, 1181 [2010]), where the motion is not converted to one for summary judgment,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Guggenheimer v. GinzburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Sokol v. LeaderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Andy Associates, Inc. v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Bokhour v. GTI Retail Holdings, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Weill v. East Sunset Park Realty, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Anzora v. 81 Saxon Avenue Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. Baumann v. Long Island Power AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Benjamin v. LaSalle Bank, N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026
  5. I-Fix-Screens-Com, Inc. v. IbrahemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API