Legal Opinion

BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. Farris

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 9, 2008No. 07-5397, 07-5424PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTTON, Circuit Judge.

In 2005, Kentucky imposed a 1.3% tax on the gross revenues of telecommunications providers. Ky.Rev.Stat. Ann. § 136.616(1), (2)(b). In connection with the new tax, the legislature banned providers from “collect[ing] the tax directly” from consumers and from “separately stat[ing] the tax on the bill.” Id. § 136.616(3). The providers filed this lawsuit because they want to identify the new tax as a line item on all customer invoices to explain why they have raised prices, while the Commonwealth says that the new law prevents them from doing so.

No one disputes…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican PartySupreme Court of the United States · 2008

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. Discount Tobacco City & Lottery, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  3. IMS Health Inc. v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  4. Dana's Railroad Supply v. Attorney General, State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  5. Islamic Center of Nashville v. State of Tenn.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API