Schmidt v. Sadri
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*703OPINION
By the Court,
Manoukian, J.:
In this appeal from a judgment in favor of respondents, defendants below, we are asked to determine whether the trial court erred in permitting respondents to introduce evidence of abandonment in an action for forcible entry and detainer, notwithstanding respondents’ failure to plead it as an affirmative defense. We discern no error.
Appellants, plaintiffs below, Larrie and Joyce Schmidt, were tenants in a house owned by respondent Fariborz Sadri in Las Vegas, Nevada. Sadri decided to sell the residence and entered into an exclusive listing with the respondent…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corporation v. SiracoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Mallett v. Uncle Sam Gold & Silver Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1865
- Kaye v. SmithermanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Mason v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Poe v. La Metropolitana Compania Nacional De Seguros, S.A.Nevada Supreme Court · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jones, Waldo, Holbrook & McDonough v. DawsonUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- Costello v. CaslerNevada Supreme Court · 2011
- Grappo v. MauchNevada Supreme Court · 1994
- Yost Ex Rel. Yost v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- Yost Ex Rel. Yost v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1981