Legal Opinion
Merritt v. Belluscio
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 30, 1910Published
Action by Daniel T. Merritt and others against Blary Belluscio.
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAB1.
■ Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and order for examination of defendant, reinstated, on the authority of Goldmark v. United States Electro-Galvanizing Co., 111 App. Div. 526, 97 N. Y. Supp. 1078; McKeand v. Locke, 115 App. Div. 174, 100 N. Y. Supp. 704; Cherbuliez v. Parsons, 123 App. Div. 814, 108 N. Y. Supp. 321, and Richards v. Whiting, 127 App. Div. 208, 111 N. Y. Supp. 21.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Goldmark v. U. S. Electro-Galvanizing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Cherbuliez v. ParsonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- McKeand v. LockeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Richards v. WhitingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908