Gooler v. Eidsness
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, McHenry county; E. B. Goss, J. Action by L. D. Gooler and another against A. Nl Eidness. There was a judgment for plaintiffs, and from an order setting the same aside and granting a new trial plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
Appeal from an order granting a new trial. The action was brought to recover compensation from the respondent for *340negotiating a sale of his farm for a stock of merchandise. The trial court directed a verdict -in appellants’ favor. Judgment was entered thereon. On respondent’s motion for a new trial, the judgment was vacated and a new trial granted. Error is assigned on the claim that there was no issue of fact presented by the answer for the jury to try. It appears from the record that the action was tried upon the theory that the pleadings presented issues of fact, and we do not find that it…
2Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BraathenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- Higgins v. HawksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
- Incorporated Town of Casey v. HogueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- In Re Assessment of the Property of & the Shares of Stock in the Sioux City Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1936
- Shuman v. LesmeisterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.