Legal Opinion

State v. Dickens

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 2, 1974No. 47,122PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an original proceeding in discipline.

Respondent, Jimmie H. Dickens, took exception to the recommendation of the State Board of Law Examiners (hereinafter referred as the Board) that he be suspended from the practice of law for an indefinite period.

The complaint against respondent was filed by Phillip L. Waisblum, a member o£ the Missouri Bar engaged in the practice of law in Kansas City, Missouri. Mr. Waisblum was attorney for the estate of Phillip Lindstrom, which at the time of the complaint was being probated by the public administrator in the probate court of Jackson County,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pearcy v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  2. Ahalt v. GatewoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  3. Jackson v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  4. Grayson v. GraysonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  5. Farmer v. MarvinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kasting v. American Family Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
  2. Hilsabeck v. Lane Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
  3. Jones v. Montgomery Ward & Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. State v. MoellerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API