Legal Opinion

Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. Bailey

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1952PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This is an action tried at a trial term before a jury in which the plaintiff seeks to recover damages for injury to its oil pipe line resulting from an alleged trespass by the defendant.

The essential facts, as proved on the trial, are simple and generally conceded by both parties. The plaintiff, a producer *365and distributor of oil and petroleum products, is the owner of an easement to maintain and operate and has, in fact, for a long period of time operated a pipe line across certain rural property-in Cattaraugus County now owned by the Vacuum G-as Burner Company. At the time involved herein,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kujek v. . GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Elder of First Baptist Church in Hartford v. WitherellNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  3. New York Steam Co. v. . Foundation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Wintringham v. LafoyNew York Supreme Court · 1827
  5. Frontier Telephone Co. v. HeppNew York Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Norman Birnbaum, B. Leonard Avery and Mary Rule MacMillen Plaintiffs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  2. People v. MunafoNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. KeltonArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Pioneer Natural Gas Co. v. K & M PAVING CO.Texas Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Laverne v. CorningDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API