Legal Opinion
Agro Dutch Industries, Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 23, 2006No. Court 04-00493Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MUSGRAVE, Judge;
Without concluding whether substantial evidence supported the administrative finding that the expenses of transporting recalled merchandise from the United States to India constitute indirect selling expenses associated with U.S. sales, the Court remanded for reconsideration and clarification of Commerce’s antidumping duty calculus on the matter. See Slip Op. 06-40 (CIT Mar. 28, 2006); Certain Preserved Mushrooms From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 69 Fed. Reg. 51630 (Aug. 20, 2004) & accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Atlantic Sugar, Ltd. v. The United States and Amstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Luciano Pisoni Fabbrica Accessori Instrumenti Musicali and Enzo Pizzi, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Thai Pineapple Public Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- American Silicon Technologies v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001